AI Intelligence · Global Radar · Asia-Pacific Focus
A structured reference for tokenized real-world assets worldwide — digital green bonds, funds and on-chain protocols — with deep coverage of Asia-Pacific and Greater China. Built for analysts who cite their sources.
Coverage
The deeply-sourced core of our Asia-Pacific coverage — each entry traced back to a named, public primary source — anchoring a global radar of the wider tokenized market.
Every tranche of the HKSAR Government's tokenized green bond programme — ISIN, coupon, tenor and settlement rail — sourced from HKMA announcements and the Hong Kong Government Bond Programme.
Regulated tokenized money market and investment funds — like Franklin OnChain HK and the ChinaAMC HKD Digital fund — with NAV cadence and authorisation status traced to the regulator.
The DLT infrastructure beneath each issuance — HSBC Orion, the CMU's digital platform and Project Ensemble participants — so you can trace where an asset is actually settled, not just who issued it.
The Database
3rd Digital Green Bond
Government of HKSAR
Franklin OnChain US Gov MMF
Franklin Templeton
ChinaAMC HKD Digital MMF
ChinaAMC (Hong Kong)
2nd Digital Green Bonds
Government of HKSAR
1st Tokenised Green Bond
Government of HKSAR
Ensemble Project
HKMA
Why RWA Radar
Every field on every Asset Card links back to the primary document it came from — a government portal, a regulatory filing, an issuer prospectus. No press summaries, no unattributed estimates. You can verify anything we publish in under a minute.
Each issuance is expressed in one consistent schema: ISIN, Issuer, Coupon, Maturity, Settlement Rail and Status. Comparison across issuances becomes a query rather than a research project — which is the difference between a database and an archive.
A global radar with deep Asia-Pacific roots. We track the worldwide tokenized market while going deepest where regulatory clarity is highest and issuance most traceable — Hong Kong, Greater China and the wider Asia-Pacific.
Data Integrity
Every entry in the database originates from a publicly accessible primary source. We do not accept issuer submissions, synthesise figures from secondary press coverage, or infer data points that are not explicitly stated in an authoritative document. That discipline is the only way to build a reference practitioners can actually cite.
When a field cannot be confirmed from a government announcement, a regulatory filing, an issuer disclosure or a recognised standards body, we show a dash rather than a best guess. An honest gap is more useful to a researcher than a confident error.