Data · Global · 10 min read
By RWA Radar Research · Published
Key Takeaways
CoinGecko's RWA Report 2026 is one of the most-cited snapshots of the tokenized real-world-asset market. It is also one of the most-reposted — and by the time its figures have passed through a chain of Chinese-language and aggregator reposts, the numbers tend to drift: a growth rate gets attached to the wrong line, a billion becomes a million, a single token's market cap gets confused with an issuer's entire gold holdings.
This page is a data-verified digest. Every headline figure below is traced to CoinGecko's original report — which, for the question “what did the report actually say,” is the primary source. Where the report makes an asset-level claim we can check against an issuer or an independent dashboard — a token's market cap, a reserve, a backing model — we did the cross-check and note any discrepancy. The brand promise is simple: we re-checked every number against the source. For how we read any tokenized instrument, see our methodology.
The report covers the sector from the start of 2025 through Q1 2026, with a 31 March 2026 snapshot date for market-cap figures (per CoinGecko). Keep that date in mind: a live dashboard you check today will read higher, because the market kept growing after the snapshot.
The top-line story is straightforward growth, but the exact numbers matter — these are the ones most often garbled downstream:
One verification note on the largest line. CoinGecko's 31 March 2026 figure for tokenized Treasuries works out to roughly US$13.0 billion (67.2% of US$19.32 billion), after the class crossed US$10 billion on 11 February 2026 (per CoinGecko). Checked against the independent rwa.xyz dashboard on 29 May 2026, tokenized Treasuries read approximately US$15.0 billion — higher, but consistent with continued growth past the report's snapshot, and with the same lead issuers the report names (BlackRock's BUIDL, Ondo, Franklin's BENJI, WisdomTree and Superstate). Different dates, same direction.
Underneath the headline, each segment tells its own story (all figures per CoinGecko unless cross-checked below):
The Asia-Pacific thread runs through the commodity segment. Among the smaller gold tokens, Singapore-issued XAUM (Matrixdock) scaled roughly elevenfold to US$0.07 billion and entered the top five (per CoinGecko). Matrixdock — part of the Matrixport group — backs each XAUM 1:1 with LBMA-accredited physical gold vaulted in Asia, with reserves independently audited by Bureau Veritas, the auditor of the world's largest gold ETF (per Matrixdock). That issuer-level detail is what turns a row in a chart into a verifiable claim.
These are the specific places where downstream reposts of this report tend to break — and what the source actually says:
The pattern is consistent: the errors are rarely invented numbers, they are correct numbers attached to the wrong line, the wrong unit, or the wrong date. That is exactly the failure mode a primary-source check catches.
Our standard is the same one we apply across this site, including the Hong Kong RWA regulation timeline: an aggregator like CoinGecko or rwa.xyz is a primary source for what its own report or dashboard states, but an asset-level fact — a specific token's market cap, a reserve, a regulatory status — must be traced back to the issuer or regulator.
Where we could not trace a sub-claim to a primary source — the report's unnamed CEX breakdown, or the legal wrapper and regulatory status of individual tokenized stocks — we simply repeated what the report says and went no further. The companion verification record lists every number, its source, and every fact we deliberately left out. That discipline is the whole point: a figure you cannot trace to a source is a figure we do not print.
CoinGecko
rwa.xyz
Tether Gold (TG Commodities)
Paxos